Blurred people walking

Pre-Autumn Budget 2024: Individuals and firms

Pete Fairchild, Partner, Jennifer McNally, Partner, Mark Stemp, Partner, Rebecca Durrant, Partner, Simon Warne, Partner and Alex Conway, Partner, Professional Practices and Private Clients
10/09/2024
Blurred people walking

There is much speculation in the press about whether and how the government might raise taxes while keeping within both manifesto promises and statements not to raise taxes on working people. Many are wondering what taxes are in line for reform. There can be no certainties in this type of future gazing – there are many possibilities, which is why many will be paying close attention on Budget day.

In his own words, the new Prime Minister Sir Kier Starmer has warned that the October Budget will be painful, but the detail on what this means in practice has yet to be announced. It is however likely that those with independent wealth will be affected as Capital Gains Tax and Inheritance Tax are rumoured to be very much on the agenda.

Key considerations for:

  • Capital Gains Tax (CGT) - While CGT does not raise a huge amount of tax (£14.4 billion in 2023) it is straightforward to change. A simple uplift to the rate could be implemented quickly – we have seen this happen before with effect from Budget day. The concern is then whether there will still be relief for businesses on gifts or sale. 
  • Inheritance Tax (IHT) – IHT reform was last considered in 2019. We could see a rate increase here but what is more likely is a removal or restriction of some of the reliefs available. Business Relief and Agricultural Relief are very valuable and important for intergenerational family businesses. A big concern is that these reliefs will be removed, making succession planning a costly exercise.
    A more sensible approach would be that IHT and CGT will become aligned, and reliefs will continue to be available on active business interests rather than passive investments such as AIM portfolios.
  • Pensions and investments – Tax relief on pension contributions could also be targeted, restricting tax relief to basic rate (20%) only. A review of the tax-free status of the fund for IHT should also not be ruled out, as well as a restriction on the tax-free lump sum. Possible restrictions to ISA allowance could also be considered.
  • Income tax – What is not likely to change are income tax rates and reliefs. Fiscal drag is continuing to increase revenue, bringing more people into the tax net and higher rate bands as the years progress. We could see a reduction in thresholds, or the level at which the personal allowance is abated.
Non-domiciled individuals

The new government published a paper on 29 July 2024, outlining their current thoughts on the changes to the non-dom regime. While it will largely implement the Foreign Income and Gains (FIG) regime proposed by the Conservatives in the Spring Budget (which will apply for the first four years of residence only), Labour plan to go further to remove tax advantages for non-doms.

We need to wait until the Budget on 30 October for further detail, but currently understand:

  • there will not be transitional measures in respect of foreign income for existing remittance basis users
  • rebasing for capital gains will be available but the date is to be confirmed
  • the Temporary Repatriation Facility (TRF) may be extended to make it more attractive and it will potentially include offshore structures
  • a form of overseas workday relief will be retained
  • IHT looks set to apply to those who have been UK resident for 10 years and they will remain within the scope until they have been non-UK resident for 10 years.

Action:

The window of opportunity for planning is tight with the changes expected to take effect on 6 April 2025. Non-doms should appraise their position and organise their affairs in readiness for the new regime. It is particularly important to review offshore structures to ensure they are fit for purpose beyond April 2025.

Business owners and entrepreneurs

Under the current tax rules, many lifetime share transfers in family companies, (such as to adult children) can be made without any CGT or IHT liabilities arising. This is because:

  • CGT – holdover relief elections can be signed so that for tax purposes any shares gifted transfer at the donor’s base cost rather than at current market value.
  • IHT – a liability would likely only arise if the donee disposed of the gifted property (or it ceased to be a trading company qualifying for IHT exemption under Business Relief) and the donor passes away within seven years of making the gift and the value of taxable assets exceeded the IHT Nil Rate Band at the time. If this were a concern to donors, it may be possible to take out a special type of insurance known as term life assurance to cover this seven-year period of risk.

If the government wants to discourage wealth transfer down generations without any tax being payable (whether that be CGT, IHT and/or even a new wealth tax), they could remove the option of making holdover relief elections and/or include the value of the shares being gifted in some form of cumulative ‘pot’ of lifetime gifts, which either results in IHT becoming payable during lifetime or upon death.

Action:

If you were considering transferring any shares to your children in the foreseeable future, you may wish to consider making these (or at least some) transfers before the upcoming Budget.

There are wider considerations related to gifting shares or other assets (whether directly or into Trust), and you should always seek professional advice specific to your circumstances if you are considering this as a way forward. For example, for companies or groups with significant cash, investment assets or property there are specific conditions which need to be met, considered and understood if a gift is not to cause a surprising and unwelcome ‘dry’ tax charge for the donor.

Residential property landlords

Speculation with property taxes has been rife. There is an expectation that CGT rates are to increase, but the timing is not yet known. Many are looking at whether it is commercial to trigger gains by transferring property now and paying tax at the current rate. Transfers between family members (non-married), Trusts and companies can, with the right planning, all achieve this. 

This change is bringing forward our clients’ succession planning, encouraging gifting sooner rather than later, which will not only trigger CGT at the lower rate, but is also good IHT planning.

We already know that Furnished Holiday Let (FHL) rules are to be abolished from April 2025, and this will bring in more income tax and CGT from those with an investment portfolio which currently qualify under the attractive tax regime.

Action:

It is vital those with FHLs are aware of these changes to restructure their business, potentially in advance of the Budget where feasible and wanting to lock in existing legislation.

The tax changes are likely very significant for most and perhaps make the investment much less rewarding, or at worse uncommercial.

We also expect a 1% increase in Stamp Duty Land Tax for non-UK resident individuals purchasing UK residential properties.

More extreme views have suggested that main residence relief (no CGT on the disposal of your main home) could be at risk, perhaps with a limit so relief is capped and tax paid on larger gains. Furthermore, the base cost uplift that is currently obtained on the tax-free inheritance of a property (for example from a spouse) may be abolished, which may accelerate succession planning through earlier gifting or disposal of properties.

Partners and professional service firms

Some areas where the new government might look to act in order to reduce the £22 billion ‘black hole’ in public finances are:

Pension and ISA Allowances

Currently an individual is able to contribute into their pension and receive marginal rate tax relief. The amount an individual can contribute into their pension is complex but can be up to a maximum of £60,000 per year gross (if no allowances are brought forward and no tapering for income applies (minimum annual limit of £10,000 where income exceeds £312,000)), providing certain individuals with 45% tax relief on contributions made. This is a relief that could raise significant revenue, especially if relief was capped at a flat 30% or even 20%.

The annual ISA allowance is currently £20,000, which allows amounts placed into a cash and stocks/shares ISA to grow tax free (income and CGT). Restricting the annual ISA limit again would again go some way to closing the funding gap.

Action:

Individuals should consider their current positions and may wish to make contributions to their pensions and ISAs, where they have ability (prior to 30 October 2024) to secure the current allowances available.

Salaried Member Rules (SMR)

In February 2024, HMRC altered its guidance in respect of the SMR. These are a set of rules which if passed in full will mean a partner in an LLP will be treated for tax purposes as an employee, with their renumeration subject to employers’ National Insurance (13.8%). HMRC has launched a number of enquiries in respect of the SMR with LLPs in the professional services industry (covering the past four tax years). While the change in guidance is currently being clarified with HMRC, Labour could look to tighten the rules regarding SMR to bring fixed share partners into the scope of employer National Insurance.

Action:

Firms should review their SMR compliance and consider if a revised remuneration structure for certain members of their partnership should be put into place.

CGT

This is currently a small proportion of the overall tax take for the government. In recent years, the annual exemption in relation CGT has been cut from £12,300 to £3,000, but CGT is still levied at a lower rate (20% top rate (excluding property and carried interest) than income tax (45% top rate). The government might look to change the rate of CGT in order to plug deficits, but if alignment with income tax was planned, we would expect some degree of inflation relief to be available.

Action:

Some firms might hold significant assets in their accounts such as property, share portfolios or art pieces. If a firm was looking to secure the current CGT rate and allowances for its members in respect of assets held, they might look to crystalise any gains on these prior to the Budget. If they were to then look to repurchase the asset, a gap of 30 days would need to arise to prevent any anti-avoidance ‘bed and breakfasting’ provisions.

    What next?

    It is tempting to make decisions now and hope that they fall within rules that we are familiar with but with any transfer of wealth there are considerations beyond tax that are equally, if not more, important – family dynamics and asset protection for example should always be top of the agenda of any discussion around wealth planning. Discuss your options now with your advisor and your family and start working out what you want to achieve. The tax situation should then follow that plan.

    Tax is a complex subject, and this article is intended to provide a simplification and raise awareness of the main issues in advance of the Budget. This article does not constitute actual advice. When contemplating transactions of any kind, you should always seek tax advice so it is specific to your circumstances.

    If you have any questions on the issues raised in this article, get in touch with your usual Crowe contact.

    Contact us

    Peter Fairchild
    Pete Fairchild
    National Head of Private Clients
    London

    Insights

    Find out what important changes have been made in HMRC's guidance.