UK resident non-doms are individuals with a domicile outside the UK who are living in the UK but who have no intention to remain here permanently or indefinitely. For the first 15 years of UK residence, they are able to claim the ‘remittance basis’ in respect of non-UK income and capital gains, they are only chargeable to UK tax if and when the income and gains are brought to the UK. They remain chargeable to UK tax on their UK income and capital gains in the year that they arise (the ‘arising basis’).
After 15 years of UK residence they become ‘deemed UK domiciled’ and are no longer able to claim the remittance basis, when non-UK income and capital gains then become chargeable to UK tax on the arising basis.
Whereas UK domiciled individuals (and those who become deemed domiciled after 15 years of UK residence) are within the scope to inheritance tax (IHT) on their worldwide assets, non-doms are chargeable to UK IHT only on the value of their assets situated in the UK. The non-UK assets of a deemed dom leaving the UK remain within the scope of IHT for three years following departure (the ‘IHT tail’).
Before becoming domiciled (actual or deemed), individuals are able to settle assets into trust (‘protected settlements’) so that trust income and gains (with the exception of UK source income) are not chargeable to tax unless matched to distributions or benefits provided to beneficiaries. Furthermore, any non-UK assets held within settlements remain outside the scope of IHT, even when the settlor has become UK domiciled.
Despite headlines to the contrary, domicile is a common-law concept and will not be abolished. However, from 6 April 2025 it will no longer apply in determining liability to UK tax. Instead, a new residence-based regime will apply for income tax, capital gains tax (CGT) and IHT purposes.
UK residence for any year from 2013/14 will be determined by reference to the Statutory Residence Test (SRT) The pre-SRT rules will apply for earlier years.
Split-years under the SRT and years of dual residence where an individual is treated as treaty resident in another jurisdiction will count as years of UK residence under the new regime.
The use of domicile to determine liability to UK tax is rather an outdated concept in these days of greater international mobility. It can also be quite subjective and in recent years we have also seen an increasing number of lengthy and costly HMRC enquiries into clients’ domicile status. The Statutory Residence Test offers certainty on residence for a tax year, and now becomes crucial in determining individuals’ exposure to UK taxes. Domicile will however continue to be important in relation to historic offshore structures in determining their exposure to UK tax.
The FIG regime represents an attractive-short term benefit for new arrivals but the four year period does not compare favourably with the duration of similar schemes on offer from other jurisdictions.
The requirement to identify and report in annual tax returns the FIGs not chargeable to tax is an unwelcome administrative burden. It will also provide HMRC with significantly more detail of individuals’ offshore assets and investments than what is currently available under the remittance basis regime.
The TRF represents a welcome transitional relief for those non-doms who have previously claimed the remittance basis and do not qualify for the FIG regime - particularly those who may be running low on clean capital.
It will work differently than most advisers had originally anticipated. Instead of just remitting pre-6 April 2025 FIGs in one of the three years to 2027/28 and paying the reduced amount of tax for that year, it is instead necessary to designate and pay tax at the reduced rate on amounts to remit, which can then be remitted at any time as required. This offers a certain amount of flexibility, both in terms of spreading the tax cost over the three TRF years and the ability to take advantage of the lower rates of tax on sums intended to be remitted after 5 April 2028.
It appears that 5 April 2017 has been selected to align with the rebasing date for those who became deemed domiciled at that date. However, as the rebasing facility will only be available for assets that have been held for at least eight years at 6 April 2025, it will be of relatively limited application.
Despite lobbying over the summer months, it was always unlikely that the existing trust protections would survive a change of government.
The original proposals mentioned only 10 years of residence with a 10-year tail, so the rather more nuanced approach to be introduced offers some welcome flexibility. However, it still brings non-UK assets into charge to IHT at a much earlier stage than under the existing non-dom regime (after 10 years rather than 15) and generally gives a longer tail.
Individuals who have left the UK permanently will have certainty that their non-UK assets will be outside the scope of IHT on expiry of the tail, which is often not the case under the current domicile test.
How easy will it be for HMRC to monitor continuing liability to IHT for individuals who have left the UK permanently – particularly those with a long tail?
Again, the loss of IHT trust protections was always unlikely to survive the change of government, although the exclusion of existing trusts from the double-taxation resulting from the GWROB rules is a small crumb of comfort. The application of the excluded property rules to tax 10-year anniversaries and exits will require careful monitoring and adds a further layer of compliance. However, older settlors may think that one or possibly two 10-year charges at a maximum of 6% is a price worth paying to avoid IHT at 40% on death.
The alignment of OWR with the FIG regime is sensible and extends eligibility for the relief for a further year. The simplification of the operation of the relief is also welcome, as is the ability to receive the earnings relating to overseas workdays in the UK with no liability to tax. However, we can see no good reason why the relief should be capped annually.
Now is the time for individuals affected by the changes to take stock of their affairs and consider how they might restructure in readiness for the new world. For those existing non-doms who wish to remain in the UK, they will be navigating several sets of rules which adds complexity and cost. Some may leave and manage their days carefully, so they break UK tax residence.
It's fair to say exposure to UK IHT on worldwide assets is of grave concern to many so considering the application of estate tax treaties will become more relevant than ever in trying the minimise exposure.
The attractiveness of the FIG regime to new arrivals remains to be seen, particularly in a relatively short period of 4 years and the level of disclosure required in order to make a claim.
Will the UK perhaps become a short-term tax haven for those wishing to undertake transactions free of tax?
In the coming months we expect greater clarity on how the new regime and transitional relief will operate from a practical perspective and that legislation will be finalised before the start of the new tax year.
This note is intended as an overview of the proposed new legislation and does not constitute advice. For detailed advice on the application of the new regime to your own particular circumstances please get in touch with your usual Crowe contact.
Insights