- Accounting method changes could be beneficial for many taxpayers.
- Taxpayers should model the outcome of various method changes to determine whether a change could make sense for them.
Throughout 2022 and 2023, significant increases in interest rates put a strain on operating cash flows and increased the cost of funds borrowed to pay tax liabilities. Many taxpayers also are facing higher taxes as a result of tax law changes that recently took effect, such as changes that expanded the limitation on interest deductibility under IRC Section 163(j), capitalization and amortization of IRC Section 174 research and experimental costs, and the phaseout of bonus depreciation. Accounting method planning can be a powerful tool to more favorably manage tax-related cash flow and mitigate related issues.
Accounting methods generally relate to the timing of the recognition of income or expenses. Reviewing current accounting methods could reveal opportunities for more favorable tax treatment, such as in the following situations:
In most cases, a taxpayer is required to request IRS consent to change its existing accounting method by filing Form 3115, “Application for Change in Accounting Method.” Certain method changes are eligible for automatic consent, meaning that the request is automatically granted if the Form 3115 requesting the change is filed with the IRS in Ogden, Utah, and is attached to the taxpayer’s income tax return for the year of change filed by the due date (including extensions). Other method changes require advance consent. If a nonautomatic method change is requested, the taxpayer may not apply the method change unless and until the IRS approves the request. A taxpayer requests a nonautomatic method change by filing a Form 3115 with the IRS national office before the last day of the tax year for the year of the change. Nonautomatic method changes require payment of a user fee. A user fee is not required to request an automatic method change.
Reviewing current accounting methods does not come without some cost. Internal staff will need to provide information relevant to current accounting methods, including internal policies and other documentation. Additionally, user fees to request a nonautomatic change and professional fees might apply. In many cases, however, an acceleration of deductions or a deferral of revenue can result in more favorable tax treatment for the current year that would persist into the future.
Crowe observation
Accounting method planning can provide significant and meaningful time value of money savings, particularly with increased costs of capital, that outweigh costs incurred.
Consider an example relating to the timing of the deduction for employee bonuses:
The following table illustrates that, in nominal value (referring to the undiscounted monetary value respective to each year shown), the method change does not change the total amount eligible to be deducted by the taxpayer. However, the additional $1 million deduction in 2023 in present value dollars when tax effected is worth approximately $114,000 more than the $1 million reduction in the deduction in 2032, the taxpayer’s final year of business.
|
Current method |
With method change |
Difference – unfavorable/(favorable) |
|||
(Amounts in 1,000s) |
Nominal value |
Present value |
Nominal value |
Present value |
Nominal value |
Present value |
Tax deduction – 2023 |
0 |
0 |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
($1,000) |
($1,000) |
Tax deductions – 2024-2031 |
$8,000 |
$5,971 |
$8,000 |
$5,971 |
$0 |
$0 |
Tax deduction – 2032 |
$1,000 |
$544 |
$0 |
$0 |
$1,000 |
$544 |
Total deductions |
$9,000 |
$6,515 |
$9,000 |
$6,971 |
$0 |
($456) |
Tax rate |
25% |
25% |
||||
Time value savings |
$0 |
($114) |
As the example illustrates, it is likely worth the additional cost to implement this method change. A taxpayer might recognize an even better result because several of the following assumptions used might understate the present value benefit:
The benefit of deferring income or accelerating a deduction on a present value basis can persist even through potential increases in tax rates in the future. It can be a worthwhile exercise for taxpayers to model the impact of various method changes and evaluate the extent of any sensitivity to changes in assumptions, such as changes in discount rate or tax rate, to understand the true economic benefit of a change.
Accounting method opportunities are not always readily apparent, so taxpayers should work with their tax advisers to review their existing accounting methods to consider any opportunities for tax planning, as the benefits can be significant.