Changes proposed to Section 162(m) and retirement plan rules

| 9/30/2021
Tax News Highlights Featured Image

Significant changes to compensation and benefit tax provisions have been proposed in the budget reconciliation bill, referred to as the Build Back Better bill, recently passed by the House Ways and Means Committee. Specifically, the bill would accelerate expansion of limits on a public company’s deduction for executive compensation and tighten the tax rules for certain retirement plans, including individual retirement accounts (IRAs).

Acceleration of expanded executive compensation limit

Under IRC Section 162(m), a publicly traded company’s deduction for compensation is limited to $1 million per year per covered employee. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) amended IRC Section 162(m) to remove the exception for performance-based compensation. The TCJA also expanded the definition of covered employees to include any individual who serves as CEO or CFO at any time during the year and the three most highly compensated officers for the tax year (other than the CEO or CFO).

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARP) expanded the group of covered employees for purposes of IRC Section 162(m) for taxable years beginning after 2026. Under that provision, the next five highest-compensated employees would be added to the current list of officers whose compensation is subject to the IRC Section 162(m) limitation.

The bill that was passed by the House Ways and Means Committee would accelerate the effective date of the ARP expansion of IRC Section 162(m), making it effective for taxable years beginning after 2021.

Retirement plan changes

$10 million limit on accumulations

The proposal would impose a $10 million limit on accumulations in certain tax-favored retirement plans, including qualified defined contribution plans, 403(b) plans, governmental 457(b) plans, IRAs, and Roth IRAs for high-income individuals. The limit would apply to taxpayers with adjusted gross income (AGI) exceeding $400,000 for single individuals, $425,000 for heads of household, and $450,000 for married individuals filing jointly. Both the $10 million limit and the AGI thresholds would be indexed for inflation. If accumulations exceed the $10 million limit, current-year contributions to IRAs (Roth or regular) would be prohibited and a 6% excise tax would apply to excess contributions.

Required minimum distributions

The proposal would increase the required minimum distributions for taxpayers subject to the $10 million limit if aggregate applicable retirement plan balances exceed the $10 million limit. Any distributions required under these provisions would be exempt from the 10% penalty tax otherwise applicable to early distributions from retirement plans.

Roth conversions

Under the proposal, taxpayers subject to the $10 million limit would not be able to convert traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs and would not be able to convert non-Roth amounts in 401(k), 403(b), or governmental 457(b) plans to an amount held in a designated Roth account or Roth IRA. This provision would apply to tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2031.

All taxpayers would be prohibited from converting non-Roth amounts to Roth IRAs or designated Roth accounts if any portion of the distribution that is being converted consists of after-tax contributions.

Investment restrictions

  • IRA assets would not be permitted to be invested in any security if the issuer of such security requires the individual on whose behalf the IRA is maintained to represent that the individual has a specified minimum amount of income or assets, has completed a specified minimum level of education, or holds a specific license or credential. Transition rules apply to IRAs already holding such securities.
  • An IRA would not be permitted to invest in a nonpublicly traded entity if the IRA owner has an interest of 10% or more in such entity (attribution rules apply) or if the IRA owner is an officer or director of such entity. Transition rules apply to IRAs already holding such investments.
  • An IRA would not be permitted to invest in a domestic international sales corporation (DISC) or foreign sales corporation (FSC) that receives any commission or other payment from an entity with any stock or interest that is owned by the individual on whose behalf the IRA is maintained. An IRA that does not comply with these investment restrictions would cease to be an IRA, but the 15% excise tax on prohibited transactions would apply only to impermissible investments in a DISC or FSC.

Other changes

  • IRA owners would be disqualified persons with respect to their IRAs for purposes of the prohibited transaction rules, regardless of whether they would be disqualified persons on another basis.
  • The period for the IRS to assess tax would be extended from three years to six years if there is a substantial error in reporting the value of IRA assets and in the case of a prohibited transaction.
Sign up to receive the latest tax insights as well as tax regulatory and administrative updates.

Looking ahead

It remains unclear what, if anything, in the Build Back Better bill will be enacted. However, taxpayers should consult with their tax advisers now to determine and mitigate the potential impact of these changes. For instance, there might be opportunities to mitigate the effects of the IRC Section 162(m) changes by accelerating compensation into 2021 (by paying a bonus in 2021 that normally would be paid in early 2022) or by accelerating the vesting of restricted stock that otherwise would vest in early 2022.

Related topics

Crowe tax professionals review the new Section 174 rules and address issues considering the limited IRS guidance. 
Organizations need to consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) tax planning to comply with potential requirement changes and be competitive.

The 2022 midterm elections created a lot of uncertainty and a divided Congress. How will that impact tax oversight and legislation?

Crowe tax professionals review the new Section 174 rules and address issues considering the limited IRS guidance. 
Organizations need to consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) tax planning to comply with potential requirement changes and be competitive.

The 2022 midterm elections created a lot of uncertainty and a divided Congress. How will that impact tax oversight and legislation?

Contact us

Our experienced tax professionals can help you tackle your most pressing tax challenges. Contact the Crowe tax team today.
daum-tim-225
Tim Daum
Principal, Washington National Tax