October 2024 financial reporting, governance, and risk management 

| 10/16/2024
October 2024 financial reporting, governance, and risk management

Message from Sydney Garmong, Partner, National Office

With the third quarter in the rearview mirror, we are monitoring how the industry’s financial results are unfolding. Of course, we will have a full picture of industry performance next month.

Two accounting standard-setting observations that are relevant for financial institutions:

  • Segment reporting. For public entities, Accounting Standards Update 2023-07 "Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures,” is effective for Dec. 31, 2024, for calendar year-ends. In preparing for the revised disclosures, please keep in mind the changes for financial services. Existing guidance provided an exception that allowed entities to present net interest income if certain conditions were met. The revised guidance effectively removes that exception to require presentation of interest expense in segment footnote disclosures. We believe the change will be more impactful for those with multiple segments.
  • Purchased financial assets. For acquisitive institutions, this project is likely top of mind. The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a proposal in June 2023 to expand the “gross-up” approach to significantly more acquired assets in business combinations and asset acquisitions. Earlier this month, the board addressed six issues related to scope, spending the most time evaluating whether revolving credit facilities, particularly credit cards, should be within the scope of the project. This was one of the consistent topics in comments received in response to the exposure draft. While the board did not conclude on revolvers, board members were supportive of providing scope exceptions for these types of facilities. We believe this is a positive development.

Our annual Crowe financial services conferences are just around the corner. This year, we plan to bring you updates on accounting and financial reporting, risk, tax, and other topics. We hope to see you at one of our eight locations – and new this year is the addition of a Washington, D.C., location. Two-day sessions begin Nov. 7 and run through Dec. 17, 2024, and provide up to 11 hours of CPE credit.

Meanwhile, please watch for our conference recaps of the AICPA & CIMA banking and credit unions conferences. Thank you for turning to Crowe to keep you informed.

Sign up to receive updates on accounting, governance, risk management, and compliance issues.
From the federal financial institution regulators

OCC and FDIC finalize rules for bank merger applications

On Sept. 17, 2024, the board of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) approved a final Statement of Policy (SOP) and a final rule, respectively, on the evaluation of bank merger transactions.

The FDIC’s final SOP outlines the agency’s evaluation criteria and expectations, noting that the agency may consider “account concentrations beyond deposits, including small business or residential loan originations” in assessing a merger’s competitive effects. It also clarifies that a proposed merged institution should result in lessened financial risk, and a greater ability to meet the community’s needs. The SOP states that public hearings must be held for mergers that would result in an institution with more than $50 billion in total assets, and mergers that would result in an institution with $100 billion or more in total assets will be subject to additional scrutiny.

The OCC’s final rule amending its procedures for reviewing applications under the Bank Merger Act eliminates the agency’s expedited review process and the use of the streamlined business combination application. In an accompanying policy statement, the OCC provides additional information on the principles for reviewing proposed bank merger applications. The policy statement outlines factors that may lead to quicker or more delayed approval timelines for proposed mergers, and the OCC’s decision process for extending the public comment period or holding a public meeting.

FDIC proposes rule for custodial account recordkeeping

On Sept. 17, 2024, the FDIC issued a proposed rule that would bolster recordkeeping requirements for bank deposits received from certain third-party entities, implementing more stringent requirements for third-party arrangements and offering greater protections for depositors.

In the proposal, the FDIC noted recent events, including the Synapse Financial Technologies bankruptcy, which caused uncertainty about the beneficial ownership of funds deposited by the fintech and related difficulties in determining whether the accounts were FDIC-insured.

The proposed rule would require insured banks that hold certain custodial accounts containing nonbank deposits to perform daily account reconciliations by individual owner and comply with other recordkeeping requirements. It would also provide a bank’s primary federal supervisor with oversight and enforcement authority.

Comments are due Dec. 2, 2024.

OCC updates supervisory operating plan

On Oct. 1, 2024, the OCC published its annual bank supervision operating plan for FY25, guiding its supervisory strategy and resource allocation, and outlining areas of focus for the coming fiscal year. The updated supervision plan describes the OCC’s “risk-based supervision approach focused on evaluating risk, identifying material and emerging concerns, and requiring banks to take timely corrective action before deficiencies compromise their safety and soundness.” It states that this approach will require examiners to assess the effects of internal and external factors on a bank’s risk profile.

The supervisory plan also outlines the agency’s areas of focus for FY25 examinations divided into financial (credit, allowance for credit losses, asset and liability management, capital, and climate-related risks for large institutions); operational (cybersecurity, enterprise change management, operations, third-party, and payments), and compliance (BSA/AML, CRA, and fair lending).

OCC issues bulletin on commercial lending refinance risk

On Oct. 3, 2024, the OCC issued a bulletin discussing the effects of refinance risk and providing updated guidance on sound refinance risk management practices. In times of rising interest rates, nonamortizing loans (for example, interest-only loans, commercial real estate loans, leveraged loans, and revolving working capital lines) are most affected by refinance risk, in particular with a high number of loans maturing in underperforming markets. High volumes of refinanced loans can place significant stress on a bank’s financial position, liquidity, and earnings, and banks might incur additional costs to resolve problem loans.

The bulletin discusses risk management practices and risk rating considerations addressing refinance risk at both the individual transaction level and the portfolio level. At the transaction level, banks should consider refinance risk when structuring loans at origination, risk-rating loans, and continuously monitoring loans through maturity. Banks should also assess, monitor, and control refinance risk at the portfolio level, setting appropriate underwriting exception limits, concentration limits, and other controls.

Fed issues RFI on discount window operations

On Sept. 5, 2024, the Federal Reserve (Fed) issued a request for information (RFI) soliciting public feedback on discount window operational practices, including “the collection of legal documentation; the process for pledging and withdrawing collateral; the process for requesting, receiving, and repaying discount window loans; the extension of intraday credit; and Reserve Bank communication practices related to the discount window and intraday credit.”

The Fed noted that the agency is not requesting comments on policy changes, such as “eligibility criteria and terms for discount window advances and intraday credit,” but rather seeks to identify ways to enhance operational efficiencies.

Comments are due Dec. 9, 2024.

FHFA issues guidance for FHLBanks when providing liquidity

On Sep. 30, 2024, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) issued a proposal to allow Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) greater ability to manage and respond to member liquidity needs. The proposal would exempt investments with a maturity of one day or less where the principal is repaid to the bank daily from the “general limit” on extensions of unsecured credit to a single counterparty. This change would align treatment of these investments – including interest-bearing deposit accounts and other authorized overnight investments – with that of overnight federal funds, which are limited only by the less restrictive “overall limit.”

Comments are due Dec. 2, 2024.

From the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)

Take note: ASU changes the disclosure of interest expense for financial operations segments

The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures,” on Nov. 27, 2023, to enhance disclosures about significant segment expenses for public entities reporting segment information under Topic 280. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted.

Within the existing guidance, ASC 280-10-50-22 provides: “A public entity shall report interest revenue separately from interest expense for each reportable segment unless a majority of the segment’s revenues are from interest and the chief operating decision maker relies primarily on net interest revenue to assess the performance of the segment and make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment. In that situation, a public entity may report that segment’s interest revenue net of its interest expense and disclose that it has done so.” However, in ASU 2023-07, the FASB added the following: “Nonetheless, a public entity shall separately disclose interest expense if it is a significant segment expense in accordance with paragraph 280-10-50-26A.” As explained in the basis for conclusion section addressing interest expense for financial operations segments, the board “decided that the amendments in this update should require that a public entity disclose gross interest expense when that amount meets the criteria in paragraph 280-10-50-26A, even if the public entity meets the conditions in paragraph 280-10-50-22 for disclosing net interest revenue for a financial operations segment” (par. BC76).

FASB discusses purchased financial assets

At its meeting on Oct. 2, 2024, the FASB redeliberated the proposed ASU, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Financial Assets,” specifically related to the gross-up approach and treatment of held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities, loan commitments and forwards contracts to purchase financial assets, contract assets and lease receivables, and trade account receivables.

The board confirmed the decision to include HTM debt securities in the scope of the gross-up approach and that all purchased HTM debt securities are deemed seasoned. However, the board decided that HTM beneficial interests would be subject to the gross-up approach only when accounted for under Subtopic 326-20, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses – Measured at Amortized Cost,” and that those within the scope of Subtopic 325-40, “Investments – Other – Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets” should follow the guidance in that subtopic.

Additionally, the board decided:

  • “To recognize off-balance-sheet credit exposures under the gross-up approach by recognizing the credit loss in other comprehensive income on the date that an entity either (1) enters into a forward commitment to purchase financial assets accounted for under the gross-up approach or (2) purchases an unfunded commitment that would have been accounted for under the gross-up approach if it had been funded at the purchase date.”
  • “To exclude contract assets and lease receivables from the scope of the gross-up approach and clarify that any initial allowance for credit losses should be established through the income statement and not through purchase accounting.”
  • “To exclude trade accounts receivable from the scope of the gross-up approach.”

The board directed the staff to research credit cards, other consumer revolvers, and commercial revolvers to determine which assets should be included in a scope exception, and to perform additional research on credit-impaired available-for-sale debt securities.

FASB proposes hedge accounting improvements

The FASB, on Sept. 25, 2024, issued a proposed ASU, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements,” to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of an entity’s risk management practices by addressing the following five issues:

  • Similar risk assessment for cash flow hedges: Expand the hedged risks permitted to be aggregated in a group of individual forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge by changing the “shared risk exposure” requirement to “similar risk exposure.”
  • Hedging forecasted interest payment on choose-your-rate debt instruments: Facilitate applying the change in hedged risk guidance to cash flow hedges under “choose-your-rate” debt instruments by using the contractual terms of the debt agreement to determine the alternative interest rate indexes and interest rate tenors without needing to discontinue hedge accounting. The proposed ASU would also allow entities to use simplified assumptions when assessing certain factors.
  • Cash flow hedges of nonfinancial forecasted transactions:
  • Net written options as hedging instruments: Permit a compound derivative comprised of a written option and a nonoption derivative (for example, an interest rate swap with a written cap or floor) to qualify as a cash flow hedge instrument by adjusting certain eligibility criteria.
  • Foreign-currency-denominated debt instrument as hedging instrument and hedged item (dual hedge): Eliminate the recognition and presentation mismatch related to a dual-hedge strategy by requiring an entity to exclude the debt instrument’s fair value hedge basis adjustment from the net investment hedge effectiveness assessment.

The proposed ASU would be applied prospectively for existing hedging relationships as of the date of adoption, with early adoption permitted. Entities may be either required or permitted to modify certain terms of existing hedging relationships, without dedesignating the hedge.

Comments are due Nov. 25, 2024.

From the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

SEC adopts final rule on minimum pricing increment

On Sept. 18, 2024, the SEC adopted final amendments to Regulation National Market System (NMS) to “amend the minimum pricing increments for the quoting of certain NMS stocks, reduce the access fee caps, and enhance the transparency of better priced orders.”

The amendments lower the minimum pricing increment to $0.005 for certain NMS stocks that meet a time-weighted average quoted spread threshold over a specified evaluation period. They also lower access fee caps, setting an access fee cap of $0.001 per share for NMS stocks priced at $1.00 or more, and a cap of 0.1% of quotation price per share for those priced under $1.00. Finally, the amendments expedite the timeline by which entities must implement the round lot and odd-lot definitions and mandatory off-lot information changes introduced by the SEC’s 2020 market data infrastructure rules.

The final amendments are effective Dec. 9, 2024. Entities must comply with the amended minimum pricing increment, access fee caps, and round lot definitions by the first business day of November 2025, and the odd-lot information requirements by the first business day of May 2026.

SEC adopts final rule on EDGAR account access and management

On Sept. 27, 2024, the SEC adopted final rule and form amendments modernizing access and account management of the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system. The amendments, collectively referred to as EDGAR Next, will prepare filers for updates to EDGAR.

The final amendments require all filers to designate at least two individuals as authorized EDGAR account administrators (or one, if the filer is an individual or single-member company). Designated account administrators will need to present individual account credentials from Login.gov and complete multifactor authentication to manage the account and maintain filer information on EDGAR. These individuals may access the beta platform through Dec. 19, 2025, for testing and feedback, including developing optional Application Programming Interface (API) connections.

The new platform will go live and take enrollments starting March 24, 2025. Enrollment closes on Dec. 19, 2025, but filers must comply with the changes by Sept. 15, 2025, in order to continue to file on EDGAR. Additional information on EDGAR Next, including a detailed transition timeline, can be found here.

SEC issues on small business policy recommendations

On Sept. 19, 2024, the SEC published a report based on its 43rd Annual Small Business Forum, held in April. The report includes highlights from panel discussions on early-stage founder and funder experiences; investing in early-stage companies; and going and staying public as a small-cap company. It also summarizes policy recommendations developed by participants, as well as the SEC’s response to each recommendation.

SEC enforcement director leaves

On Oct. 2, 2024, the SEC announced the departure of Director of the Division of Enforcement Gurbir Grewal, after three years in the post, effective Oct. 11, 2024. Deputy Director Sanjay Wadhwa will step in as acting director upon Grewal’s departure. Wadhwa has served as deputy director since August 2021, and previously served in the New York regional office, and in the Market Abuse Unit. Sam Waldon, who has been chief counsel since March 2022, will become acting deputy director.

From the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

PCAOB issues report on target team inspection observations

On Sept. 25, 2024, the PCAOB released “Spotlight: Observations From the Target Team’s 2023 Inspections.” The report summarizes the target team’s inspection results and observations and provides examples of good practices that might contribute to audit quality in the execution of engagement procedures related to the focus areas. The focus areas for 2023 included crypto assets, multilocation audits, and significant or unusual events or transactions.

PCAOB Investor Advisory Group holds meeting

On Sept. 26, 2024, the PCAOB held a meeting of its Investor Advisory Group. The meeting included a standard-setting update and presentations on audit committees’ audit-related engagement with investors, audit firm ownership structures and funding arrangements, cyber risk on external audits, and critical audit matters. A recording is available on the PCAOB’s event page.

From the Center for Audit Quality (CAQ)

CAQ addresses auditor’s role in assessing and responding to fraud risk

In October 2024 the CAQ published “The Role of the Auditor: Assessing and Responding to Fraud Risk.” It presents insights into practices, tools, and considerations that can help auditors enhance their professional skepticism and overall approach to assessing and responding to the risks of material misstatement resulting from fraud during the audit. It also provides clarity about the auditor’s role and responsibilities related to fraud and gives insights for those who are involved in evaluating and using financial reporting information. There are many stakeholders whose influence and responsibilities have a significant impact on fraud deterrence and detection, and the mitigation of fraud risk is greatest when all in the financial reporting environment fulfill their roles.

FASB materials reprinted with permission. Copyright 2024 by Financial Accounting Foundation, Norwalk, Connecticut. Copyright 1974-1980 by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Upcoming events

Contact us

Sydney Garmong
Sydney Garmong
Partner, National Office
Dennis Hild
Dennis Hild
Principal, National Office
Mark Shannon
Mark Shannon
Partner, National Office