Under Canada’s domestic rules, an individual is considered a factual resident of Canada when they have significant residential ties to Canada. The CRA considers any of the following residential ties to be significant:
For example, if a professional athlete spends a portion of the year in the U.S. playing with a U.S.-based team, but their family remains in their primary Canadian residence, in the eyes of the CRA, the athlete is likely a Canadian tax resident.
The CRA may also consider secondary ties, such as personal property, social and economic ties, a Canadian passport or driver’s license, or Canadian medical coverage when determining an individual’s residency status. No single secondary tie will bind someone to Canada, but these ties must be considered in determining residency status. The more secondary ties to Canada a player has, the higher the likelihood they are to be considered a Canadian resident.
To determine if an individual has ceased to be a resident of Canada, it is necessary to establish whether they have severed their significant residential ties. For instance, a Canadian resident athlete who signs a contract with a U.S.-based team does not automatically cease factual residency. However, if in the process of joining the U.S. team, the athlete purchases a property in the U.S. and either sells their Canadian residence or converts it into a rental property, they could potentially cease factual residency.
Similarly, when an athlete moves to Canada, their residency depends on whether they have established significant residential ties.
For example, a player who is traded from a U.S. team to a Canadian team, moves with their spouse and children to Canada, and purchases a new home, has established significant residential ties with Canada. Under Canada’s domestic rules, this athlete would likely be considered a resident of Canada.
An individual who is not a factual resident of Canada could still be considered a deemed resident if they spend 183 days or more in Canada in one year.
Where an athlete is considered a tax resident of two countries pursuant to each countries’ domestic rules (as a result of ties to both countries), the applicable tax treaty between the two countries should be reviewed to confirm which country has the right to tax the athlete’s worldwide income as a tax resident. If an athlete is a US citizen or has a US green card, additional complexities can arise which will need to be reviewed.
The province or state of taxation can also be a major consideration given the large differences in provincial and state tax rates across Canada and the US. It is also important to note that many US states do not respect tax treaties, so local state residency rules will need to be reviewed with care.
Related Insights
Contact Us